
- 1800 UC IPASS PHONE NUMBER SOFTWARE
- 1800 UC IPASS PHONE NUMBER SERIES
- 1800 UC IPASS PHONE NUMBER WINDOWS
The Itanium 2 employs an entirely new architecture and instruction set, whereas the Opteron extends the existing x86 architecture.
1800 UC IPASS PHONE NUMBER SERIES
As you can see from Table 2 and Table 3, page 26, the Opteron's 1000-unit pricing for 100 and 200 series processors is substantially less than the Itanium 2's pricing and should help system vendors create 64-bit Opteron-based servers that cost less than similarly configured Itanium 2–based systems.ĪMD and Intel have taken different approaches to 64-bit computing. The different instruction sets and architectures make clock-speed comparisons meaningless.

Don't assume that Operon's higher clock speeds necessarily translate into performance better than Itanium 2's. (Hardware vendors can use third-party chipsets to build servers that have more than eight processors.) Table 2 lists the Opteron's technical specifications.

All models are available in 100, 200, and 800 series versions that support servers with one, two, or as many as eight processors, respectively, when paired with the AMD-8000 series core logic chipset. Intel's 8870 core logic chipset supports 2 to 16 processors however, some first-tier server vendors have developed their own core logic chipsets that support more than 16 processors and offer additional capabilities.ĪMD has released 1.4GHz, 1.6GHz, 1.8GHz, and 2GHz versions of its 64-bit Opteron processor. The company also introduced a low-voltage 1GHz version of Madison with 1.5MB of 元 cache the company claims that this processor uses about 50 percent less power than other Itanium 2 models. Table 1, page 24, compares McKinley's and Madison's technical specifications with those of the original Itanium (Merced).Īt press time, Intel introduced a lower-priced 1.4GHz version of Madison for dual-processor applications this model features 1.5MB of 元 cache. The new manufacturing process lets Intel increase Madison's clock speeds to 1.3GHz, 1.4GHz, and 1.5GHz and enlarge 元 cache sizes to 3MB, 4MB, and 6MB, respectively, from McKinley's 1.5MB and 3MB cache sizes. Madison, the current generation of Itanium 2, uses a smaller process size (i.e., the average size of a chip's features) resulting in shorter electrical paths and a smaller surface area. The first Itanium 2 processors (code-named McKinley) were 900MHz and 1GHz models that featured an improved architecture that substantially improved performance while maintaining binary compatibility with the original Itanium. Intel 64-bit processors debuted in 2001, with the introduction of Intel's first-generation 733MHz and 800MHz Itanium processors (code-named Merced). If you aren't ready to migrate your 32-bit applications to their 64-bit versions (or can't because 64-bit versions aren't available), your server applications are bumping up against the 32-bit system's 4GB memory limits, or your applications need higher performance levels than current Intel Xeon-based servers can provide, now might be the time to reevaluate your server strategy. Because 32-bit performance has been Itanium's Achilles heel, Opteron could address a major concern of 64-bit server buyers.

1800 UC IPASS PHONE NUMBER WINDOWS
But published TPC-C test results () demonstrate that the Opteron's performance using current 32-bit applications and Windows 2003 is extremely good.

In addition, AMD released its long-awaited 64-bit AMD Opteron processor last year, and Microsoft has promised to support the chip with a soon-to-be-released 64-bit version of Windows Server 2003.īecause Microsoft hasn't yet released a version of 64-bit Windows for AMD's chip, comparing the 64-bit performance of Itanium 2 with Opteron under Windows is impossible.
1800 UC IPASS PHONE NUMBER SOFTWARE
As a result, enterprise software and server vendors are now supporting the 64-bit processor. Last year, Intel introduced the second-generation Itanium 2 processor (code-named Madison), which, according to published Transaction Processing Performance Council TPC-C test results (), delivers on the 64-bit performance promises of its Explicitly Parallel Instruction Computing (EPIC) architecture. If you haven't been following this segment of the server market during the past 2 years, you might want to take a second look powerful new processors from AMD and Intel make migrating to 64-bit servers more compelling than ever. When Intel introduced the 64-bit Itanium processor in 2001, most buyers (and many server vendors) virtually ignored the chip because of its poor performance and weak third-party software support.
